Cannon Kingsley vs Cosme Rolland De Ravel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 06:42 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Kingsley vs C. Rolland De Ravel

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kingsley 1 - 0 Ravel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cannon Kingsley winning 2 and Cosme Rolland De Ravel winning 0. The last match between Cannon Kingsley and Cosme Rolland De Ravel was at the M25 Southaven, 06-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kingsley | 1 |
| Ravel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Southaven(08-06-25)
C. Kingsley vs C. R. D. Ravel H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.00% (145-105) | Career Total W/L | 57.14% (8-6) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Kingsley vs C. R. D. Ravel Match Preview:
- Ravel slightly trails Kingsley in second serve performance, winning 40.88% compared to Kingsley's 41.56%. Does this indicate a potential edge for Kingsley in scenarios reliant on second serves?
- Ravel demonstrates stronger return statistics, winning 49.09% of opponents' second serve points, exceeding Kingsley's 46.83%.
- Examining first serve return success, Ravel leads with 29.67% while Kingsley claims 27.15%.
- Handling pressure, Ravel has saved 50% of breakpoints compared to Kingsley's 48.59%.
- In terms of overall wins, Ravel has achieved 83.33%, a stronger record than Kingsley's 53.66% over the past year.
- Both have surface preferences; Ravel excels on Hard courts with a 100% record, whereas Kingsley performs best on Clay with a 62% success rate.
- Ravel is accustomed to higher-level competition, facing opponents with an average rank of 269.33, compared to Kingsley's average of 422.71.
- If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Ravel has the advantage, winning all deciding sets in the past year, whereas Kingsley has won 38%.
- Ravel narrowly edges on breakpoint conversion at 35.14%, slightly ahead of Kingsley's 34.12%.
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
In recent months, Ravel has demonstrated a noteworthy capability on return, outperforming Kingsley in both second and first serve return percentages. This skill, coupled with an impressive 100% success rate in deciding sets, suggests a resilience that could be pivotal if the match becomes tightly contested.
While Kingsley holds a slight advantage in second serve success, Ravel's higher pressure-saving abilities give them the edge in critical points, which could prove crucial at pivotal moments during the match.
In terms of experience, Ravel has faced opponents of a higher average rank, which may translate into an advantage given the competitive rigor they've been exposed to recently.
Given these factors, along with Ravel’s superior overall match-winning percentage and understanding of high-level competition, Ravel is arguably the favored player to secure victory in this upcoming encounter.
Cannon Kingsley vs Cosme Rolland De Ravel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Kingsley vs C. R. D. Ravel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:36:32 | Average Match Time | 1:36:32 |
| 61% (40/66) | 1st Serve % | 56% (31/55) |
| 68% (27/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (16/31) |
| 42% (11/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 51% (28/55) | Return Points Win % | 42% (28/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Kingsley Recent Matches Played
C. R. D. Ravel Recent Matches Played

C. Kingsley vs C. R. D. Ravel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.00% (145/105) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 56.62% (325/249) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.61% (16/15) |
| 53.71% (2933/2528) | Games Win/Loss | 51.05% (146/140) |
| 54.46% (61/51) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 61.82% (34/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.56% (5/4) |
| 60.24% (50/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.54 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1442 | Aces Total | 28 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 455 | Total Double Faults | 46 |
| 1:32:27 | Average Match Time | 1:31:46 |
| 428.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 307.43 |
| 62% (9657/15552) | 1st Serve % | 56% (464/834) |
| 72% (6943/9657) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (309/464) |
| 52% (3056/5894) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (174/370) |
| 41% (604/1477) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (36/83) |
| 39% (6071/15603) | Return Points Win % | 41% (331/805) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (49/49) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 64.43% (96/53) | Futures W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 58% (143/247) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (8/14) |
| 44% (32/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 52% (40/77) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 87% (142/124) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (7/7) |
| 13% (142/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (7/0) |
| 19% (108/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (7/1) |